Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William W. Cates

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:William W. Cates}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William W. Cates}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:William W. Cates}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. asilvering (talk) 06:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

=[[:William W. Cates]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Wesley Cates}}

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=William W. Cates}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:for William Wesley Cates ({{Find sources AFD|title=William Wesley Cates}})

:for William W. Cates ({{Find sources AFD|title=William W. Cates}})

This article does not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for biographies (WP:BIO). The subject lacks significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. The citations provided are either self-published, primary sources, or trivial mentions. The Los Angeles Book Festival award appears to be a pay-to-play contest rather than a widely recognized literary honor. The bibliography consists entirely of self-published works, which do not contribute to notability. Additionally, the National Geographic reference does not substantiate the claim regarding the winery. Given the lack of verifiable, independent coverage, this article does not demonstrate the subject’s encyclopedic notability and should be considered for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NicholasEyes (talkcontribs) 03:01, February 6, 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.