Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WinGeno

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 13:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[WinGeno]]=

:{{la|WinGeno}} ([{{fullurl:WinGeno|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WinGeno}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Contested PROD. References insufficient to demonstrate notability. Fails WP:N. ukexpat (talk) 14:27, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Keep More independent ref's have been added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.148.113.165 (talk) 19:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 15:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 15:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete Seems like nice software, but no indication of notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

{{ambox

| type = content

| image = 56px

| text = This article was flagged for rescue at approximately this point in the discussion{{ #if: 84.148.113.165 | by 84.148.113.165. |.}}}}

Delete All references are blogs. The developer is the article's main proponent, so there are WP:COI issues here. --Karnesky (talk) 17:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.