Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Win Wenger

:{{la|Win Wenger}} ([{{fullurl:Win Wenger|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Win Wenger}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{find sources|Win Wenger}})

lack of notability jadrian (talk) 00:02, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC){{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Win Wenger||}}

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —John Z (talk) 10:07, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. There is also the question of whether Image streaming should be deleted as well. Both seem to be professional puff. Xxanthippe (talk) 11:38, 16 August 2009 (UTC).
• Delete. Does not pass WP:PROF and does not have sufficient third-party non-academic citations to pass WP:BIO more generally. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:34, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Per nomination and the above comments. Rather sad, really, for no study has come out to declare in bald terms the utter fallaciousness of the claims made by him and his ilk. But who knows? Perhaps one day a study might vindicate him. Until then: trash it. The same seems to go for image streaming as well; I couldn't find any information save for the rabbit hole to some book that I would be required to purchase...—argumzio ϝ 04:23, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.