Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows Contacts

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 17:32, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

=[[Windows Contacts]]=

:{{la|Windows Contacts}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Windows_Contacts Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Windows Contacts}})

This article lacks notability, as indicated in the Multiple issues template. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:05, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:29, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Keep Microsoft is a massive company with far to many products and services to include them all in the main article per WP:PRODUCT. Being a Microsoft product, it was guranteed to get WP:GNG passing coverage. For example: [http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/03/q-a-finding-and-using-windows-contacts/] Winner 42 Talk to me! 05:16, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:49, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 03:53, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Keep per Winner 42's reasoning, and per WP:COMMONSENSE about the notability of this, which was (for better and worse) ubiquitous in the Windows world. --Arxiloxos (talk) 08:01, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.