Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winfrasoft

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete. Schuym1 (talk) 08:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

=[[Winfrasoft]]=

:{{la|Winfrasoft}} ([{{fullurl:Winfrasoft|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winfrasoft}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Speedy was contested, but the creator still hasn't given a reason for why it shouldn't be deleted. Reads like an advertisement. Schuym1 (talk) 20:20, 7 September 2008 (UTC) Schuym1 (talk) 20:20, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Delete I read over the information and though that I could stubify the article or add it into Microsoft Internet Security and Acceleration Server, but it is just only one of many solutions for microsoft products. Other then an award from ISAserver.org, which is not that notable, there really is no other sources that are not a form of advertisement. Article fails WP:COMPANY as the parent policy that Wikipedia:Notability (software) has defered too... --Pmedema (talk) 21:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Speedy delete. Nominator jumped the gun, should have waited for an admin to speedy-delete the article or remove the speedy tag. Just because the article's author slapped a "hangon" tag under the speedy-delete tag, doesn't mean it still won't get deleted. This AfD proposal is unnecessary. =Axlq 22:14, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 22:41, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 22:42, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 22:42, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.