Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wisconsin Watchdog

:{{la|Wisconsin Watchdog}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wisconsin_Watchdog Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Wisconsin Watchdog}})

Fails WP:WEB notability guidelines. Trivial mention in external literature without serious coverage of the website itself. Watchdog.org is the proper article, and this is not a legitimate WP:CFORK. jps (talk) 20:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  20:35, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

:Delete - there is nothing here that does not belong in either Watchdog.org or else in Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity. No case is made, or can be made as far as I can tell, for the notability of this website, even locally in Wisconsin. ((Full disclosure: I am a proud Wisconsinite and deeply despise everything this website and the groups it is affiliated with have done to ruin my beloved home state. That has nothing to do with my opinion on this AfD.)) --Orange Mike | Talk 22:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

• Delete -the topic isn't even really worth mentioning on the Watchdog.org article, also worth mentioning that not only is it not notable, but it doesn't even focus on the organization's history or anything that would make it significant, it just talks about trivial activities Burroughs'10 (talk) 05:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
• Delete and also draft and userfy if needed as I actually found several links at Books, News, browsers and Highbeam it seems but perhaps not better notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:53, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.