Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WorldHotel-Link
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NorthAmerica1000 02:30, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
=[[WorldHotel-Link]]=
:{{la|WorldHotel-Link}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|WorldHotel-Link}})
Appears to fail WP:CORPDEPTH. All present refs are either broken, primary, or of extremely dubious reliability. Not finding sufficient refs elsewhere. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:03, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:58, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:58, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 11:23, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:25, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable, definitely fails WP:CORPDEPTH. ☃ Unicodesnowman (talk) 16:52, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I found a few brief mentions, e.g. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=TXXzw1GBiAYC&pg=PA83&dq=world+hotel+link&hl=en&sa=X&ei=IkCuVKTxGYn0UtyJhJAF&ved=0CGUQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=world%20hotel%20link&f=false this], [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=y6x9BAAAQBAJ&pg=PT73&dq=world+hotel+link&hl=en&sa=X&ei=PECuVLvIL8v6UMaPgdAP&ved=0CDcQ6AEwATgK#v=onepage&q=world%20hotel%20link&f=false this], and [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=S20qVNWyW28C&pg=PA526&dq=world+hotel+link&hl=en&sa=X&ei=PECuVLvIL8v6UMaPgdAP&ved=0CEcQ6AEwBDgK#v=onepage&q=world%20hotel%20link&f=false this], but nothing significant and nothing that suggests that the company merits an encyclopedia article. --Michig (talk) 08:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.