Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Artificial Intelligence Competition for Youth

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=World Artificial Intelligence Competition for Youth}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=World Artificial Intelligence Competition for Youth}})

Non-notable event. Sources are a mix of primary and passing mentions, and search finds nothing better. Was already rejected at AfC, moved into main space regardless, re-draftified, published again, so next stop AfD. Fails WP:GNG and every other flavour of notability I can think of. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Education, Computing, and United States of America. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
• Delete per {{no ping|DoubleGrazing}}. No claim of significance, no sources satisfying WP:GNG provided. Tollens (talk) 08:15, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
• :There's quite a lot of sources; which do you not approve of? What would you require? Figbiscuits (talk) 08:17, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
• ::All of them. I'd require the same thing as WP:GNG, independent sources offering significant coverage of the subject. Tollens (talk) 08:33, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
• ::@Figbiscuits: if you do not understand how notability is demonstrated, you really shouldn't be moving declined/rejected drafts past AfC into the main article space. You are only creating extra work for others, including here at the (already congested) AfD. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
• Delete - I have trimmed some references that don't mention WAICY at all. The remaining references are mere mentions and/or primary sources. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
• Delete - I would suggest punting back to draft, but as the author is pblocked from draft space for bad pagemoves from draft to mainspace (see WP:AN/I#User:Figbiscuits) this would just cause it to languish. None of the sources proffered are any good; my findings are pretty much the same as Charmer's. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{Source assessment notes} 16:03, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.