Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrascally wabbit
{{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log|{{collapse top|bg=#F3F9FF|1=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrascally wabbit|padding=1px}}|}}
=[[Wrascally wabbit]]=
:{{la|Wrascally wabbit}} ([{{fullurl:Wrascally wabbit|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrascally wabbit}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
:({{findsources|Wrascally wabbit}})
There is no evidence whatsoever that this expression is in any kind of widespread use--and even if it were, it wouldn't be an encyclopedic topic. Article was prodded before and prod removed; I'm taking it to AfD. Drmies (talk) 02:23, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Unencyclopedic entry. Not even capable of dictionary entry. Bongomatic 02:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Dewete While Elmer Fudd in numewous cawtoons bewated a "Wascally Wabbit," due to his swight speech impediment, he never once wefewed to a "Wrascally Wabbit," and I have studied aw Fudd cawtoons. Faiws vewifiabiwity and notabiwity. Edison (talk) 02:46, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. The phrase "wascally wabbit" might warrant a redirect, but "wrascally [sic] wabbit" does not. --darolew (talk) 03:13, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Did you mean "Wediwect?" Edison (talk) 03:22, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
{{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log|{{collapse bottom}}|}}