Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X11 color names

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ —usernamekiran (talk) 00:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

=[[:X11 color names]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=X11 color names}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=X11 color names}})

WP:NOTGUIDE and no indication of warranting a separate article. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they {{pipe}} talk) 03:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

: Sorry, I don’t see at all how this article would sound like a guide. Please elaborate. It is also not a simple list article but full of explanations about the genesis of these widely used named RGB colors. — Christoph Päper 07:27, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Keep. I don't read WP:NOTGUIDE as relevant since the article is not much more instructional than, say, Web colors. At worst the article does not satisfy {{tpq|a Wikipedia article should not be presented on the assumption that the reader is well-versed in the topic's field}}, but that's an argument for rewriting rather than deleting.

:The lead section needs to be cleaned up, and perhaps the whole thing needs to be restructured, but the subject easily passes WP:GNG and I don't see it failing WP:NOTDB or any other part of WP:NOT. --Richard Yin (talk) 09:46, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Keep. This is one of my favorite articles, compared to Web colors, it is much easier to understand. 🐢 (talk) 06:50, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep. I agree with Richard Yin's reasoning above. A potential improvement to the article would be reworking the lead so that what makes the X11 colors relevant is presented more explicitly. Duplode (talk) 16:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep. A useful, inormative, article. It doesn't read like a guide. Maproom (talk) 20:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.