Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XACML

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, as it is {{google scholar|XACML|widely cited in the scientific literature}} LFaraone 06:34, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

=[[:XACML]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=XACML}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=XACML}})

only sources are primary sources. lettherebedarklight晚安 06:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:53, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Keep per WP:NEXIST. [https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1330295.1330299], [https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/968559.968563], [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167642313001238]; these are just the first three results of a Google Scholar search. There's plenty more, too. ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 22:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Keep Tons of sources for just a simple Google Scholar search. Mucube (talk • contribs) 05:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Relisting as I'm not sure that a Google Search is sufficient. I'd like to hear from more editors.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:09, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

  • {{Reply to|Liz}} I don't understand your above comment. It is true to say, as others have above, that there are a good number of peer-reviewed journal papers on this topic, as shown by pages of references on GScholar. Normally that's enough to show notability - others above have linked to individual papers, what else do you want? JMWt (talk) 08:23, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

::JMWt, my mistake, I look over every AFD every day and I saw that mention as "Google Search", not "Google Scholar search". I don't see Google Scholar mentioned very often but I do see lots of editors state that others should look at regular Google search results without providing any specifics of what they found. Liz Read! Talk! 04:14, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.