Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xbox 360 applications

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Poor rationale for deletion which has not been expanded upon, and which nobody else in the discussion agrees with. Consensus is to keep. Michig (talk) 14:21, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

=[[Xbox 360 applications]]=

:{{la|Xbox 360 applications}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Xbox 360 applications}})

Wikipedia is not a list Bihco (talk) 07:28, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Keep per WP:LIST. Applications on the Xbox 360 are a vital component of the user interface and there are over [http://www.tgdaily.com/games-and-entertainment-brief/60687-xbox-live-users-topple-40-million 40 million] people that use these applications. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 16:43, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Keep What does "Wikipedia is not a list" mean? Please elaborate on your nomination reason and perhaps cite the specific policies/etc it violates. OSborn arfcontribs. 02:14, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep A lot of articles in Wikipedia also look like a list, why don't you give those articles a deletion warning? If you want to delete this article, please delete all articles in Wikipedia that look like a list first. Also, this article can tell people that what apps will release in the future. Humphreyyue 11:55, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep: for both the instructions on lists cleanup and the reasons why being a list is not a sufficient reason for deletion see WP:SAL. Being a list doesn't make page invalid. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 06:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.