Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xjetco

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. could have easily been speedy a7ed, but now it has officially been !voted deleted through an AfD, so now it will carry an automatic G4 too. Valley2city^‽ 19:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[Xjetco]]=

:{{la|Xjetco}} ([{{fullurl:Xjetco|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xjetco}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

No evidence of notability, a Google search finds virtually nothing. No sources. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 23:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete Markovich292 05:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy delete per A7, or at least delete per nomination. This article is a mess of incoherency, and certainly isn't written in an encyclopedic style. TheFeds 20:30, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete, should probably have been speedy deleted per A7, but lets just go through this. LK (talk) 08:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.