Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yasser Hareb

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:14, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

=[[Yasser Hareb]]=

:{{la|Yasser Hareb}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yasser_Hareb Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Yasser Hareb}})

Advert for non notable individual. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:48, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 15:40, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 00:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Delete - None of this currently suggests a minimally better notable article. SwisterTwister talk 08:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Keep - Yasser is an ambitious and a successful person in his field. He has achieved many things in his life and his professional career till now. Also he is a model for the youth in the UAE and the Arab Nation as a person that's why a page was created for him. It's not an advertising for him as mentioned. Please consider this point before deleting the page. Thanks.Badis1988 (talk) 20:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

::But what is needed for this to be a better article is solid in-depth third-party sources coverage (see general notability guidelines). SwisterTwister talk 20:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Delete. notable thou art not, fade into history thou must. Reads like a ad on top of all this. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:47, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Delete - Searches did not turn up enough to show they pass WP:GNG, and the article is very promotional. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:13, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.