Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yasu Akino

:{{la|Yasu Akino}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yasu_Akino Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Yasu Akino}})

Non-notable. Relies solely on one source that tells us nothing outside List of Japanese supercentenarians. Per WP:NOPAGE and the WP:WOP guidelines, she belongs on a list not a standalone article. CommanderLinx (talk) 03:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:42, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

• Delete, then create a Redirect to List of Japanese supercentenarians per CommanderLinx and probably qualifies for a speedy delete as a creation by block evading sock, User:104.56.23.57. Voceditenore (talk) 13:12, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

::The article should be deleted first and a new redirect created. The material in List of Japanese supercentenarians long predates the creation of this non-article. There was no merge requiring attribution and thus keeping the edit history. There is absolutely no reason why we should keep useless, duplicate content (even in an edit history) which simply validates and encourages the behaviour of a disruptive, long-term sockfarm. Voceditenore (talk) 15:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

• Redirect to List of Japanese supercentenarians, we never delete when a redirect is appropriate. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 16:34, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
• Delete, then redirect The nominator is correct on policy. Voceditenore is probably right about the speedy, but now that there has been a !vote to redirect, there's probably a technical bar to that course of action. Which is a shame. The blocked sock of a blocked editor who was running all over the wiki trying to reverse the settled redirects and deletions of out-of-policy fancruft longevity articles accreted to the encyclopedia by hobbyists ought not be permitted to succeed. Nor should his/her inevitable followers-on. It's hard enough to build an encyclopedia collaboratively with editors who differ, but act in good faith. Unless we neutralize the efforts of interlopers acting in clear bad faith, we condemn ourselves to the fate of Sisyphus. David in DC (talk) 17:59, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
• Delete/redirect WP:NOPAGE EEng 14:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect to List of Japanese supercentenarians#Chronological list of the oldest living person in Japan since 1992. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
• Delete/redirect. WP:NOPAGE, WP:PERMASTUB, obvious failure of WP:GNG. ~ Rob^Talk 18:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.