Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yep (software)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Yep (software)}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Yep (software)}})

This software article has zero references to establish notability. Appears to be written like a press release. After searching, unable to find comprehensive, in-depth coverage of the software itself. Article was PROD on 19 January 2023, then self-reverted 23 January 2023. JoeNMLC (talk) 19:19, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
• Question: - Created with cat=W Web or Internet; should I have used cat=T Science and technology instead? I am clueless how to move this discussion, if necessary. JoeNMLC (talk) 20:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

:Delete per nomination. - Master of Hedgehogs ^{(converse) (hate that hedgehog!)} 20:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. ConcurrentState (talk) 19:58, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Delete does not look notable to me. Article does not to show adequate sourcing and notability. Mevoelo (talk) 17:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

: Delete per nom. Encoded Talk to me! 22:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

• Delete: indeed, written like a press release. the sourcing used is reviews and that doesn't qualify as reliable sourcing. it's quite hard to find sourcing apart from those, anyway. She was ^afairy 09:49, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
• Delete: Per nom. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.