Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YesCymru

:{{la|YesCymru}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/YesCymru Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|YesCymru}})

Fails WP:GNG. Apart from a few passing mentions and the poll mentioned in the article, I find only passing mentions. Relies solely on WP:PRIMARY sources (to wit: the party's website). Kleuske (talk) 17:45, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. AdA&D 18:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. AdA&D 18:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

• Keep Article needs improvement but sourcing is available. We should judge articles on their future potential not their current state as WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. There is [http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/politics/who-yes-cymru-campaigners-trying-13683957 this] and [http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/politics/carwyn-jones-warns-wales-see-12767913 this] from the Western Mail for a start. The first one is significant, in-depth coverage and the second one involves them as a representative group speaking for the Welsh independence movement. AusLondonder (talk) 18:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

• Keep Needs improvement, not deletion. Most of those primary references should go. Derek Andrews (talk) 14:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.