Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogventures!

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

=[[Yogventures!]]=

:{{la|Yogventures!}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yogventures! Stats])

:({{Find sources|Yogventures!}})

"currently in development" is a fail against WP:CRYSTAL.

That's apart from the usual crap of an utterly trivial article, a topic without even a vague attempt to show notability, a complete lack of content and I'll let you guess what state the referencing is in. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:33, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. ({{find video game sources short|Yogventures!|linksearch=}}) • Gene93k (talk) 03:47, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:48, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Speedily please. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:16, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Delete - As per the rationale(s) brought forth in the AfD of the group behind this game, The Yogscast, which asserted the lack of notability; I would've otherwise recommended a merge to The Yogscast. However I oppose the nomination's rationale; articles about topics "in development" do not automatically fail WP:CRYSTAL as the nominator implies. Salvidrim! 19:21, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Delete for now. No hurry. Not yet notable, I see some kickstarter-related coverage in reliable sources, but nothing really passing GNG. Besides, CRYSTAL as it is in development and the few update videos there are come from a primary source, so we'll have to wait for secondary coverage. Would say merge to Yogscast per above, but they don't seem to pass notability either at this point. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 19:28, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Delete, and frankly, nuke it from orbit. Not notable, fails WP:CRYSTAL, etc. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:02, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:GNG, WP:NRVE, WP:CRYSTAL and a host of others. DocTree (talk) 03:34, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.