Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yohan Robinson

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:42, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

=[[Yohan Robinson]]=

:{{la|Yohan Robinson}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yohan_Robinson Stats])

:({{Find sources|Yohan Robinson}})

Non-free (both, beer and speech) sources require login to view. Does not pass WP:GNG, nor importance. Tek022 | Comments? 16:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete. Relatively junior faculty member that doesn't pass WP:GNG, rather resume-like. Tomas e (talk) 13:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

  • There is no requirement for sources to be free in any sense. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Comment - Absolutely correct, verifiability does not (necessarily) equal accessibility. Some editors prefer open access sources, but this is personal preference and is not supported by policy. Lesion (talk) 00:27, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete. It takes an exceptional associate professor to pass WP:PROF, and I see no such exceptionality here, especially since Robinson has only just been appointed to that position. Some of his papers are picking up citations, so he may well become Wikipedia-notable in a few years. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:52, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete, despite the rather faulty nom. He did a thesis. He published. He taught. Now for something that makes him pass WP:PROF. Let's wait a couple of years for that. --Randykitty (talk) 12:31, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Weak delete - agree does not appear to meet PROF, or at least based on the content that is there. Unsure if we are not utilizing sources that would change that. Lesion (talk) 00:27, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.