Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yonex word meaning

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 06:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

=[[Yonex word meaning]]=

:{{la|Yonex word meaning}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yonex_word_meaning Stats])

:({{Find sources|Yonex word meaning}})

PROD (concern: Article is an unsourced poorly-written dictionary entry that reads like an essay) removed by author. The article is now less poorly written, but no more encyclopedic than before. Ignatz mice•talk 03:26, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Delete, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, article has no sources. JIP | Talk 04:11, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Delete. At best, this is a dictionary definition, but even in its "less poorly written" form its meaing is unclear. Cnilep (talk) 02:06, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete. I'm not usually a big fan of NOTDICT but this is a classic case of it. And the part in the original version about China using their veto power in the U.N. to force the OED not to include the word is pure crankery, some remnants of which remain in the present version. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:12, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.