Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yong Suk Jang

:{{la|Yong Suk Jang}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yong Suk Jang}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Yong Suk Jang}})

WP:Academic Albrechtbrown (talk) 13:58, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
• Delete I don't think this academic passes WP:PROF just yet. He has some cited papers, but an h-index of 7 or so on Gscholar ([http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=Yong+Suk+Jang&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1&as_subj=soc&as_sdts=44&hl=en] my search was restricted to the social sciences owing to the existence of a biologist with the same name), his vita [http://web.yonsei.ac.kr/yongsukjang/Vita.htm] does not, at first glance, show evidence of passing any of the other WP:PROF requirements. He looks like an up-and-coming young associate prof - in other words, a typical academic who may become notable with time. Ray^Talk 21:26, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
• Weak delete. As above GS cites are 348, 36, 29, 21, 19, 10, 8.... Despite high cites of first item, not quite there yet. Too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:57, 31 March 2010 (UTC).
• Delete Not yet notable. DGG ( talk ) 04:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.