Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YouTube License System

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 19:56, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

=[[:YouTube License System]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|YouTube License System}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/YouTube_License_System Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|YouTube License System}})

Unclear what article is about. Search reveals nothing with the specific name (fails WP:GNG). Reads like an advertisement and or guide. ~ Araratic | talk 06:15, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

::A lot of users are not informed on the implications of use of Youtube. The article documents them in a referenced manner. bkb (talk) 08:21, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:31, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:31, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. WP:NOTMANUAL applies. Article is promotional and full of original research. wumbolo ^^^ 15:42, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:50, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Delete Sources outside of primary ones are terrible. We already have YouTube copyright issues and YouTube#Community_policy. This isn't even worthy of a redirect. – FenixFeather (talk)(Contribs) 20:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete I've been watching this AfD from the start hoping that something keep worthy would come along. But agree with the people above and in particular FenixFeather. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:40, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.