Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Jimmy

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Young Jimmy]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Young Jimmy}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Young Jimmy}})

This autobiography was unilaterally moved to mainspace against the WP:COIEDIT guideline. There is coverage of his songs sourced in the article, but the short length and promotional tone (e.g. as seen [https://www.clashmusic.com/news/young-jimmy-bites-back-with-deluxe-single-pull-up-to-the-party/ here]) makes it pretty clear these articles are derived from press releases, and are therefore not independent. Mach61 19:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

:You didn't take the time to read all the edits on the article clearly, you just found this article made a few deletion edits and decided to nominate it for deletion all in a rush to judgement. It only took you a day. This article was cut short by another biased editor thats why its short. All of the articles are independent sources check again. Youngjimmymusic88 (talk) 21:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

::And why is the deletion template missing, that's a no-no. Oaktree b (talk) 22:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

::Your website is hardly independent. The rest are about as unhelpful in proving notability. Oaktree b (talk) 22:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Comment: I've restored the AfD template. Don't remove it until this discussion is done. Oaktree b (talk) 22:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete: Hardly any coverage in RS. Source is a RS, but it's barely half a page... That's all I can find [https://www.clashmusic.com/news/young-jimmy-unleashes-new-single-heavy/], rest are non-RS, mostly primary sourcing. This person seems to be using wiki as PROMO. No charted singles, no awards won, not much of any kind of indication that this person is notable for our purposes here. Oaktree b (talk) 22:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Comment: 400 subscribers on youtube and 100 something daily listens on spotify do not indicate notability, further proving my point. Oaktree b (talk) 22:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Comment User Youngjimmymusic88 keeps removing the AfD tags, I've restored it once, they did it again and another user restored the tag, again... Can we please protect the page so it gets locked down until this AfD is over? Oaktree b (talk) 00:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
  • :I've made a request for protection here (I wasn't aware I could do that with Twinkle) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Young_Jimmy]. Oaktree b (talk) 00:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete, does not meet any one of the twelve criteria for inclusion at WP:NMUSIC. Not one in-depth solid independent reliable source that I can see. Blatant and unrelenting self-promotion as specifically strongly discouraged, violates our fundamental pillar of neutrality. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete - He's been hanging around the edges of the NYC scene for many years, with some minor accomplishments like session work and appearing on a reality show, and his recent solo work got a little notice. But there is simply not enough for an encyclopedic article, which must be based on significant and reliable in-depth coverage and not just his own self-promotions and minor media appearances. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.