Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Mahasi

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (WP:SNOW close). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Young Mahasi]]=

:{{la|Young Mahasi}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Young_Mahasi Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Young Mahasi}})

Fails WP:NARTIST. Significant coverage not found. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 18:15, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Favonian (talk) 18:22, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Favonian (talk) 18:25, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:MUSICBIO, obvious WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY, sources are all self-published. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:59, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:MUSICBIO. SamHolt6 (talk) 19:47, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete - Reiterating what has already been said above, the bio fails WP:MUSICBIO as well as WP:GNG. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:56, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete per nom Smallbones_(smalltalk) 02:20, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete - Insufficient coverage. Fails to meet WP:MUSICBIO, WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. --Jack Frost (talk) 07:25, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:NMUSIC. Blatant WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY. No reliable sources since most are self published. Lacypaperclip (talk) 13:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete for all the good reasons above and thx to proposer for tidying up the mess created by autobiographer after my speedy. -Roxy, Zalophus californianus. barcus 13:54, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Comment I have been watching the changes made to this article by the article creator. Despite more content being added, it is my view that these changes only add more press-release style information. Additional, the adding of links to notable people with Wikipedia articles is superfluous as notability is not inherited. I'm sticking with delete.--SamHolt6 (talk) 03:08, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete for numerous reasons. Failing WP:GNG for lack of independent significant coverage. Failing WP:MUSICBIO completely; even the article admit he is wannabe musician not signed to any major label. External links in reference to download Mp3 file directly is covert pamming. The SPA creator is either fawning fan or narcissistic autobiographer; 2 years after account creation he never edited any page (his viewable edits) except this one and their G11 deleted user page. This is professional subtle promotion so as to game G11. With these and many more reasons above this page should be deleted. –Ammarpad (talk) 09:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete Does not meet notability guidelines. Hrodvarsson (talk) 00:11, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.