Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Religious Unitarian Universalists

{{#ifeq:Young Religious Unitarian Universalists|Young Religious Unitarian Universalists||

:{{la|Young Religious Unitarian Universalists}} – (View AfD)(View log)

A long article detailing the extensive committee structure of a non-notable Unitarian Universalist Association youth group. The article is sourced entirely to the group's website. My own look for sources showed the following: They seem to create a lot of Unitarian Universalist websites that show up in a Google search ([http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Young+Religious+Unitarian+Universalists%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&start=370&sa=N]) , but I couldn't find any independent, reliable sources among them. Similarly, [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&tab=wn&hl=en&q=%22Young+Religious+Unitarian+Universalists%22+-wikipedia&ie=UTF-8 Google News] and [http://books.google.com/books?um=1&tab=wp&client=firefox-a&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&q=%22Young+Religious+Unitarian+Universalists%22 Google Books] don't yield non-trivial mentions of this specific organization. I cannot imagine a merge of any of the text to Unitarian Universalist Association, or into its notable indirect predecessor (Liberal Religious Youth) as the material is far too detailed. ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 16:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

::''Nomination also includes the article about this group's conferences: Unitarian Universalist Youth Conferences. ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 17:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - WP:RS, WP:OR, and notability concerns. /Blaxthos 17:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Appears to be original research - no reliable sources. Non-notable group as well. --DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 20:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable UU cruft Bigdaddy1981 03:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Just because these articles have not yet attracted a large number of interested editors, doesn’t mean they are of unimportance. And on the issue of independent, reliable sources, I would not expect the mainstream to report on something that doesn’t affect or come into contact with it for that mater. Also the reason there are a lot of in house web sites from this community and its wider community the Unitarian Universalist Community, is because this group and it’s sub-groups and events are of apportions to the youth and former youth who are or who were involved with it.--Devin Murphy 01:57, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Church sources can be used for matters of church doctine, issues within the church, etc. But a claim that a church group is notable requires independent sources -- sources outside the church. If it hasn't gotten the attention of external media or scholars, it isn't notable enough to be in the encyclopedia. Best, --Shirahadasha 23:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete with the option of allowing recreation of page when and if the independent sources required to establish notability can be found. John Carter 13:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Unless notability can be and is established. Brief mention may be made in Unitarian Universalism or Unitarian Universalist Association, with expansion into stub/full article as reliable, independent sources are found. "Important" and "notable" are not synonymous in Wikipedia terminology. Aleta 21:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.