Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Soulja the Realest
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. KaisaL (talk) 20:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
=[[:Young Soulja the Realest]]=
- {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young soulja the realest}}
:{{la|Young Soulja the Realest}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Young Soulja the Realest}})
subject fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
:See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young soulja the realest (February 2016) -- John of Reading (talk) 10:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Certainly some notability there, but not enough to justify an entire article, per WP:MUSICBIO, as mentioned. bojo | talk 22:46, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete No assertion of notability. Sources are mostly aggregators or stores (e.g. iTunes, MTV, MusicBrainz) and several sites that wouldn't count as reliable sources. WP:NOTINHERITED covers the rest. KaisaL (talk) 23:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete WP:G4 if (as I expect) the content is similar to the previous page that was nuked at AfD. Tagged accordingly. TigraanClick here to contact me 13:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.