Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuka Takayanagi

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:22, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

=[[:Yuka Takayanagi]]=

:{{la|Yuka Takayanagi}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yuka_Takayanagi Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Yuka Takayanagi}})

Source are mentioned mainly in several WP:TRIVIALMENTION and fictional characters without main topic to be verify WP:RS source. External links are mainly primary source and no credible source found in the internet. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 15:51, 25 December 2017 (UTC) CASSIOPEIA (talk) 15:51, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 16:03, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 16:03, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 16:04, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete: Fails GNG. There is some refbombing as there are two instances of "official" sites used as references. While acceptable as an "External link" they are not acceptable as a reference. There are two instances of pripara.jp, so 4 out of the seven do not advance notability, and trivial mention also does not advance notability. A WP:BLP on Wikipedia requires more scrutiny with sources and that is just not evident. Otr500 (talk) 07:30, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:08, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete. She appears to be a sweet lady and I wish her all the best, but I could not find any reliable sources. So I cannot vote to keep as much as I would like to do so. She is young and I hope this is merely a case of Wikipedia:Too soon. Knox490 (talk) 02:30, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.