Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZOMB

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Jimfbleak under criterion A7 with additional comment "not even a claim of notability". (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 19:15, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[ZOMB]]=

:{{la|ZOMB}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ZOMB Stats])

:({{Find sources|ZOMB}})

The film is wholly unsourced, unremarkable upcoming film, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball according to What Wikipedia is not. The film is not filming yet. Mediran talk|contribs 11:16, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete. Given that there is no coverage for this film in any reliable sources, that the user name here is ZOMB123, and that the fb page for this mentioned the Wikipedia article at about the same time this was created, it's fairly obvious that this is a case of promotion. There's no coverage for this film and might never be. If it does get coverage it can be re-added, but not until that point and I'd recommend that the user go through WP:FILM to avoid any conflict of interest. I'll just say that if Marble Hornets isn't getting enough coverage to merit an entry, then it's unlikely that an as of yet unreleased web series would get it either.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 11:49, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • delete Non notable drama series. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 11:53, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete: Just blocked user, plus "There has been Talks, but nothing has been announced." Perfect demonstration of WP:CRYSTAl, as noted. Daniel Case (talk) 12:49, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep: I see this article could of been put into the wrong category for what it is and I have see the web series start some great stuff on its YouTube page. i'm saying give it a chance to grow and I disagree with the WP:CRYSTAL act . wikipedia need to support more low-budget stuff.ZacJohn435 (talk) 14:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete per wikipedia is not a crystal ball. not yet released - not yet produced. may or may not achieve notability after release; has none as yet. The author of the article is the director of the prospective series, which raises secondary conflict of interest issues. And ZacJohn435, wikipedia is not here to support low-budget stuff.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:36, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.