Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaveshchanie russkogo fashista

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konstantin_Rodzaevsky. I'm closing as merge to the article on the author. The book itself is a composite of works published in the 30s and 40s, u. It does have some current significance, but it is primarily significant as a work of its author, and can most usefully be merged into the article on him, which will eliminate the dispute over whether to use the russian or english title DGG ( talk ) 07:29, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[Zaveshchanie russkogo fashista]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaveshchanie russkogo fashista}}

:{{la|Zaveshchanie russkogo fashista}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Zaveshchanie_russkogo_fashista Stats])

:({{Find sources|Zaveshchanie russkogo fashista}})

An article only about modern reprint edition of works by Rodzayevsky, which seems to fail WP:NB. Blacklake (talk) 13:10, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

::The book was a lot of critical articles in the Russian press, and now banned in the list of banned books of the Ministry of Justice of Russia. Therefore WP:NB meets. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 14:36, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Merge to the article about the author (Konstantin Rodzaevsky) and delete. Only minor notability. --DonaldDuck (talk) 12:21, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

  • How come all of a sudden? --Kolchak1923 (talk) 19:22, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Painfully obscure Fascist material. No notability. Delete or merge. --Ghirla-трёп- 20:19, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. It should be renamed to The Last Will of a Russian fascist. It may be notable after the court decision that it represents an extremist material [http://www.krasproc.ru/?news&id=3393 Site Prosecutor Krasnoyarsk ][http://news.nswap.info/?p=48776 Rodzaevsky book "Testament Russian fascist" was recognized as "extremist" material. ][http://www.sova-center.ru/racism-xenophobia/news/counteraction/2010/11/d20375/ Book All-leader of the Fascist Party as extremist.]; the book has been included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials. My very best wishes (talk) 04:46, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

{{reflist}}

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 14:56, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Comment - This is why I hate using Publisher UPC codes (ISBN numbers) in Wikipedia articles. We are not in the book-selling business, but such links help to put us into that position. The article, such as it goes, seems uncontroversial, informative, useful, and is poorly sourced. If it is indeed a "banned book," chances are there are extant Russian language sources. I don't have time to look at the moment and thus have no opinion other than a lasting hatred of ISBN numbers at WP. Carrite (talk) 15:28, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Merge to Konstantin Rodzaevsky. I'm overthinking this. Nobody is going to search for the transliterated Russian-language title, it is non-functional if not unencyclopedic... Just start a section on the book under his biography, importing the most useful information there. Carrite (talk) 15:31, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
  • What's the problem? Put the name in English. Although it is transliterated into [http://www.worldcat.org/title/zaveshchanie-russkogo-fashista/oclc/49660451&referer=brief_results worldcat]. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 19:49, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

::: I guess the problem is that there aren't sources showing describing the banning of the book. Without that to differentiate it and emphasize its distinctiveness in that way, the page becomes a mere summary of one title out of millions, with no viable search name for an English-speaking audience. Carrite (talk) 02:54, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

:::: I did redirection. Now the search is viable. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 12:38, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Weak keep It may be notable and better references may emerge. --Stormbay (talk) 21:36, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
  • In addition, the author of a historical figure, who became the subject of study scientists. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 09:43, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:15, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Merge and redirect to Konstantin Rodzaevsky. It doesn't look notable to me and there's no Russain language wiki article. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:32, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep In the Russian section of the Wikipedia article is. Rules article about the book all matches. Face significant, studied by scientists. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 00:13, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
  • To be clear: no deletion decision to delete here can be binding on the Russian language wikipedia. This discussion is only about the English language wikipedia.
  • Comment: I've added [http://www.sova-center.ru/en/misuse/reports-analyses/2012/04/d24302/ a ref] that seems appears to be an English-language summary of Russian-language content by the same information source. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:36, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.