Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zebra Girl

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:46, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

=[[Zebra Girl]]=

:{{la|Zebra Girl}} – (View AfDView log){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:Zebra Girl}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}

:({{Find sources|Zebra Girl}})

No notability, no sources found. Tagged for primary sources since May. Being on Keenspot is not an assertation of notability if no reliable sources exist. Precedent is also that the Web Cartoonist's Choice Award does not confer notability. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:29, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

  • No sources outside the comic itself is a delete from me. Kansan (talk) 19:37, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 20:47, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep I do find 2004 Web Cartoonist's Choice Award for Black and White Art to be a strong indicator of notability and reviews like [http://webcomicoverlook.com/2008/04/28/the-webcomic-overlook-42-zebra-girl/] to also lean that way (though self-published, it's a darn solid source in the field). I agree it certainly is borderline. Hobit (talk) 02:32, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak delete I believe that winning a single WCCA *together* with another reliable source is enough for notability. If no additional source is to be found, this webcomic may not be notable enough for Wikipedia. --Novil Ariandis (talk) 10:17, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong delete per WP:WEB, WP:N. No coverage at all in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. "Web Cartoonist's Choice Awards" are neither 1) well-known nor 2) independent. They 1) are of questionable notability themselves and 2) are hosted by the same site that hosted this webcomic. Thanks, Starblueheather (talk) 09:04, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.