Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zelnick Media Capital

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep and rename to Strauss Zelnick. Consensus this company is not notable but its owner is and there is content in the existing article worth saving. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:20, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Zelnick Media Capital]]=

:{{la|Zelnick Media Capital}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Zelnick_Media_Capital Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Zelnick Media Capital}})

A mostly unnotable holding company, fails WP:NCORP. While it does appear in some sources, it is either a brief mention (mostly in relation to its owner, Strauss Zelnick, as the CEO of Take-Two Interactive) or a re-hash of a press releases. There is no significant coverage as required by WP:SIGCOV. Lordtobi (✉) 07:18, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Lordtobi (✉) 07:18, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Keep/Rename to Strauss Zelnick - I see WSJ coverage (e.g., [https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704911704575326973401543294 here] and [https://www.wsj.com/articles/zmc-aims-for-750-million-in-launching-third-fund-11562960048 here]) as well as Hollywood Reporter and LA Times coverage. Since Strauss Zelnick currently re-directs to this page and coverage of ZMC is typically indistinguishable from coverage of Strauss Zelnick (who is clearly notable) it is quite arguable that Zelnick himself is the real subject of this article. FOARP (talk) 12:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
I do believe a more thorough article on Zelnick himself can be established per FOARP, so recommend the Keep and refocusing, but at worse Redirect to Take-Two Interactive, which is the notable topic he and ZMC are part of now. --Masem (t) 17:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Rename and suppress the redirect per {{u|FOARP}} above. Doug Mehus T·C 03:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 12:15, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Keep/Rename Zelnick Media Capital is not enough notable to have its own article but its owner Strauss Zelnick has enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. So rename and this article to focus about Strauss Zelnick not about his holding company as suggested above. Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 13:37, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Rename and rewrite - Per the above, the owner seems more notable to me than the company. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:21, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.