Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhu Di (scientist)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. Withdrawn by nominator  Philg88 talk 05:19, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

=[[Zhu Di (scientist)]]=

:{{la|Zhu Di (scientist)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Zhu_Di_(scientist) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Zhu Di (scientist)}})

:{{In lang|zh}} ({{Find sources|朱荻}})

Unclear what contributions he made to be deemed a scientist. Timmyshin (talk) 22:43, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:22, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment - He was a fellow at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2011, so, if verified, passes WP:NACADEMICS which says he's notable if he's "been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association" Article currently makes no claim to notability. [http://baike.baidu.com/view/2011921.htm this Baidu Baike article] would be a good place to start if you can read Chinese. There are lots of people named Zhu Di and I wasn't able to quickly find English-language articles on the subject. Note, WP doesn't require sources to be in English. - Metal lunchbox (talk) 23:56, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.