Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ziad K Abdelnour

:{{la|Ziad K Abdelnour}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Ziad K Abdelnour}})

There is no evidence that this person is notable. This article was created by him. It is nothing more than self promoting and self agrandizing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Worldedixor (talk • contribs) 02:20, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

• Fixed malformed nomination; no opinion from me. Stifle (talk) 07:56, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
• Delete and salt. Article has been speedily deleted 3 times in the past under different name (Ziad abdelnour, ZIAD K ABDELNOUR and Ziad Khalil Abdelnour). This version was created on the same day as the 3rd speedy deletion. My searches turn up nothing that proves notability in any variant of his name. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 09:15, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
• Quick Delete and salt. There is no concrete and convincing evidence that this person is notable. Not everyone who has a server with a bunch of websites promoting himself becomes notable by Wikipedia standards. This page was created by him (DreamMaker). It is nothing more than self promotion and self agrandizing. Worldedixor (talk) 13:12, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

• Delete. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or anything else. Ambitious enough to become notable one day so I think it is unfair to salt.  Nipsonanomhmata  ^(Talk) 12:30, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

:Thanks for your Delete vote, Nipsonanomhmata. We hope to get more salt votes. Ambition alone does not compensate for alleged traits in his personality as evidenced by him coming back from the back door every time he gets deleted. Worldedixor (talk) 03:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.