Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoids (Europe)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No evidence of independent notability; no merge-worthy content. ~ mazca talk 18:57, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

=[[Zoids (Europe)]]=

:{{la|Zoids (Europe)}} ([{{fullurl:Zoids (Europe)|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoids (Europe)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Zoids (Europe)}})

This is a trivial list of toys that does not assert notability or importance. TTN (talk) 22:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Comment - The article seems to assert notability, for example that Marvel made a comic about the toys. Based on that, I would be inclined to keep. But I may be missing something. Rlendog (talk) 03:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

:*Zoids is what's notable. This is just one of its many separate toy lines. TTN (talk) 03:34, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:59, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete no reliable sources exist to prove that this is even the correct name of this non-notable Zoids release. Article even says Australia and SE Asia too. The main Zoids article hits the high points on this; this release recolored the Japanese Zoids into red and blue factions. The end. Abductive (reasoning) 05:05, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Nothing here should be merged into the main Zoids article which already covers this release in sufficient detail and not a likely search term. Eluchil404 (talk) 00:41, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Don't see anything remotely notable here, and agree that nothing here should be merged into main Zoids article. Ohiostandard (talk) 10:47, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.