Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zycko
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
=[[Zycko]]=
:{{la|Zycko}} – (
:({{Find sources|Zycko}})
A nonnotable "business solutions" provider. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable. Promotional. References not reliable. Harsh (talk) 16:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I was about to nom this. Trivial coverage in the Register, only coverage in Microscope (newspaper) is non-trivial, and that doesn't seem like a mainstream reliable source, but a niche publication. One or two articles in a single niche publication don't seem to merit notability per WP:CORP or WP:GNG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:11, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.