Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 May 1#Category:Continental League contributors

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge/delete as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 03:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Transport infrastructure completed in 1310 to :Category:Transport infrastructure completed in the 1310s and :Category:Buildings and structures completed in 1310

:* Propose merging :Category:Transport infrastructure completed in 1323 to :Category:Transport infrastructure completed in the 1320s and :Category:Buildings and structures completed in 1323

:* Propose merging :Category:Transport infrastructure completed in 1328 to :Category:Transport infrastructure completed in the 1320s and :Category:Buildings and structures completed in 1328

:* Propose deleting :Category:Infrastructure completed in 1310

:* Propose deleting :Category:Infrastructure completed in 1323

:* Propose deleting :Category:Infrastructure completed in 1328

:* Propose deleting :Category:1310 in transport

:* Propose deleting :Category:1323 in transport

:* Propose deleting :Category:1328 in transport

:* Propose deleting :Category:1310s in transport

:* Propose deleting :Category:1320s in transport

:Nominator's rationale: merge, unnecessary complex tree for only three articles in total. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

• Support per nom. NLeeuw (talk) 14:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: withdrawn by nominator and retagged as C1. {{nac}} ‍—‍a smart kitten_[meow] 08:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Chitrali cuisine}}

:Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary; Only one article in category, which is the titular article Chitrali cuisine. Chitrali cuisine has also already been added to the proper categories, so we don't need a merge. ForsythiaJo (talk) 22:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

• The category is meanwhile empty. Presumably this is a case of speedy WP:C2F anyway. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
• Comment Yes, this category has been emptied. No need to come to CFD. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|USA for Africa songs}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|USA for Africa albums}}

:Nominator's rationale: Categories containing only 1 article. Unlikely to be expanded since the group has been inactive for 40 years. Mika1h (talk) 12:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: See comment by Pppery.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

• Keep While not a guideline, there is consensus per WP:ALBUMSTYLE "that a category for an artist's albums should be created even if they have only released one album (irrespective of whether they are likely to release more in the future)." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk • contribs) 18:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
• Does that still apply if there is no article for the artist? USA for Africa redirects to the single. – Fayenatic London 08:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

• Delete. AFAIK there is no precedent for having a category for one-off songs by any {{c|Charity supergroups}}, nor {{c|All-star recordings}}. For example, :Category:Band Aid songs / :Category:Band Aid (band) songs / :Category:Band Aid 20 songs / :Category:Band Aid 30 songs have never been created for "Do They Know It's Christmas?". – Fayenatic London 14:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
• Delete per FL. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 13:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 03:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Dutch cookies}}

:Nominator's rationale: overcategorization, attempt to empty the categories cookie and Dutch cuisine. The Banner talk 07:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

• If not kept then at least merge to :Category:Cookies and :Category:Dutch confectionery. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
• :The articles in that category were original part of both categories you have mentioned. Hence the overcategorization-claim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Banner (talk • contribs) 15:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
• Keep as category creator. What makes this over categorization? Categorizing foods by their national origin is a fairly standard practice as can be seen by container categories such as :Category:Pastries_by_country, :Category:Doughnuts by country, and :Category:Cakes by country. BaduFerreira (talk) 14:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 03:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|WikiProject Film task force usage}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Film articles with no associated task forces}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Film articles with one associated task force}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Film articles with two associated task forces}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Film articles with three associated task forces}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Film articles with four or more associated task forces‎}}

:Nominator's rationale: Outdated WikiProject tracking categories, no longer applied or used by the template that formerly used them. {{tl|WikiProject Film}} used to feature code that would count how many of the project's task forces any given film had been assigned to, and automatically sort the page into one of these categories accordingly -- but it no longer does, so none of these categories are still in any use because the template isn't populating them anymore.
They can of course be recreated in the future if they're ever actually needed again, but there's no need to indefinitely hold onto them if they're not actually being used. Bearcat (talk) 19:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: Rename to :Category:Russo-Turkish War (1676–1681) * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose renaming :Category:Russo-Turkish War (1672-1681) to :Category:Russo-Turkish War (1676-1681)

:Nominator's rationale: Recently created new category with an error in its name. The two articles filed here both say that the Russo-Turkish war that they were part of began in 1676, not 1672 -- and indeed, we have an article titled Russo-Turkish War (1676–1681), but none titled Russo-Turkish War (1672–1681). Meanwhile, there's a completely separate article about a Polish–Ottoman War (1672–1676), but the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was not part of Russia in that era, so they aren't the same thing and wouldn't belong in one merged category.
I'm not sure whether the creator just made a typo or actually merged two separate wars together, but this category should be renamed and have Russo-Turkish War (1676–1681) added to it as its head article (although I'm not inclined to preemptively add it to the wrongly-named category in the interim.) Bearcat (talk) 14:37, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

• Rename, it looks very much like a mistake. I have taken the liberty to add Russo-Turkish War (1676–1681) to the category. Marcocapelle (talk) 02:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
• Support alt rename to :Category:Russo-Turkish War (1676–1681), which uses an endash rather than a hyphen per MOS:DATERANGE, per nom and WP:C2A. Does this work for you, {{yo|Bearcat|Marcocapelle|p=?}} HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 03:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

:* Certainly! Marcocapelle (talk) 03:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

• Rename to :Category:Russo-Turkish War (1676–1681) per MOS:DATERANGE. --Aldij (talk) 17:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 03:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|5th-century Irish literature}}

:Nominator's rationale: Isolated category, not currently useful for navigation as it only holds {{c|5th-century Irish writers}}, which is already in all the parent categories via other hierarchies. – Fayenatic London 09:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

• Keep. Connector category between the Irish writers tree of cats and the Irish literature cat. 42.200.80.48 (talk) 12:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

:* Not sure what this means. :Category:Irish writers is a direct subcategory of :Category:Irish literature, how much more connection do you need. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: rename to :Category:Redirects from gendered terms. Per consensus. – robertsky (talk) 20:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose renaming :Category:Redirects from gender to :Category:Redirects from gendered terms

:Nominator's rationale: The current title, {{cat|Redirects from gender}}, was a little confusing to me - at first, the name suggested to me that this category (and the related template) might be for categorizing redirects from the name of a gender identity. I propose moving it to the more specific title {{cat|Redirects from gendered terms}}, in order to clarify the purpose of this redirect category and remove the potential ambiguity.

:Starting this CfD as a parallel discussion to the RM at {{section link|Template talk:R from gender|Requested move 1 May 2024}}. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten_[meow] 09:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

• {{a note}} Notified WikiProject Redirect of this discussion. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten_[meow] 09:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
• Support, this makes it a lot clearer. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
• Support, this wording makes more sense. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 12:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 03:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Spinozist philosophers}}

:Nominator's rationale: Redundant with either :Category:Spinozists (adherents to Spinoza's philosophy) or :Category:Spinoza scholars (philosophers who produce scholarship on Spinoza, independent of their own inclination).

All current members of this category are also in one of those two categories. Psychastes (talk) 03:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

• Support per nom. In addition, the description on the category page is such that it is hardly a defining characteristic, more a case of WP:OCASSOC. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:59, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.