Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 9#Category:Wikipedian Roblox developers
= November 9 =
== Early centuries in Somalia ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose manually merging :Category:13th century in Somalia to :Category:13th century in Africa
:* Propose manually merging :Category:14th century in Somalia to :Category:14th century in Africa
:* Propose manually merging :Category:15th century in Somalia to :Category:15th century in Africa
:* Propose manually merging :Category:16th century in Somalia to :Category:16th century in Africa
:* Propose manually merging :Category:17th century in Somalia to :Category:17th century in Africa
:* Propose manually merging :Category:18th century in Somalia to :Category:18th century in Africa
:Nominator's rationale: delete, poorly populated categories (apart from the subcategories) and Somalia did not even exist yet. The subcategories are already in :Category:13th-century African people etc. The articles are already in :Category:Somali empires but if the merge goes ahead they should also be added to :Category:13th century in Africa etc. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:57, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:1868 elections in the North German Confederation ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge to :Category:1868 in the North German Confederation. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose deleting {{lc|1868 elections in the North German Confederation}}
:Nominator's rationale: Isolated single-entry category with no clear potential for growth. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Agree in principle, but merge to :Category:1868 in the North German Confederation. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:1867 elections in the North German Confederation ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge to :Category:1867 in the North German Confederation. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose deleting {{lc|1867 elections in the North German Confederation}}
:Nominator's rationale: Isolated two-entry category with no clear potential for growth. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Agree in principle, but merge to :Category:1867 in the North German Confederation. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:Wikipedians in Shizuoka ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose deleting {{lc|Wikipedians in Shizuoka}}
:Nominator's rationale: No actual users and points to a disambiguation page. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:31, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, virtually empty category. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:Aplochitonidae ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: rename. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose renaming :Category:Aplochitonidae to :Category:Aplochitoninae
:Nominator's rationale: Taxon renamed. See :Talk:Aplochitoninae#Requested move 3 November 2024 YorkshireExpat (talk) 16:51, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
:Support To match the name of the taxon. Dimadick (talk) 19:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:Medical culture ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:Medical culture to :Category:Medicine
:Nominator's rationale: Redundant category layer SMasonGarrison 16:18, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:57, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:02, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:Wikipedian Roblox developers ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge to :Category:Wikipedian video game developers. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose deleting {{lc|Wikipedian Roblox developers}}
:Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function - WP:OC/U#narrow. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
::I wouldn't contest if other editors find the categorization too niche, but I would like to argue that its meant to better organize editors who have a technical background with Roblox as a platform and engine, especially as there are multiple Roblox games listed in the Roblox category and the List of Roblox games page on Wikipedia. Ganmatthew (talk • contribs) 16:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Seems very narrow indeed, but can probably be merged to parent :Category:Wikipedian video game developers. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Merging to :Category:Wikipedian video game developers does indeed sound like the most suitable course of action. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:38, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:People from Plum Springs, Kentucky ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:People from Plum Springs, Kentucky to :Category:People from Warren County, Kentucky
:Nominator's rationale: Category with just one entry. Lost in Quebec (talk) 14:47, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:07, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
==Category:Serious games==
== Category:Artists who acted in films and television shows ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: speedy delete as WP:G4. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:16, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose deleting {{lc|Artists who acted in films and television shows}}
:Nominator's rationale: Non-defining intersection between occupations SMasonGarrison 12:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:09, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
:Note: This category was nominated on 3 Nov 2024 with a consensus to delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk • contribs)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Wrong names of assessment categories for the Philippine music task force ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: already moved. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:16, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- :Category:FA-Class Philippine music articles → :Category:FA-Class Philippine music task force articles
- :Category:GA-Class Philippine music articles → :Category:GA-Class Philippine music task force articles
- :Category:B-Class Philippine music articles → :Category:B-Class Philippine music task force articles
- :Category:C-Class Philippine music articles → :Category:C-Class Philippine music task force articles
- :Category:Start-Class Philippine music articles → :Category:Start-Class Philippine music task force articles
- :Category:Stub-Class Philippine music articles → :Category:Stub-Class Philippine music task force articles
- :Category:FL-Class Philippine music articles → :Category:FL-Class Philippine music task force articles
- :Category:List-Class Philippine music articles → :Category:List-Class Philippine music task force articles
- :Category:Category-Class Philippine music articles → :Category:Category-Class Philippine music task force articles
- :Category:Disambig-Class Philippine music articles → :Category:Disambig-Class Philippine music task force articles
- :Category:Draft-Class Philippine music articles → :Category:Draft-Class Philippine music task force articles
- :Category:File-Class Philippine music articles → :Category:File-Class Philippine music task force articles
- :Category:Portal-Class Philippine music articles → :Category:Portal-Class Philippine music task force articles
- :Category:Project-Class Philippine music articles → :Category:Project-Class Philippine music task force articles
- :Category:Redirect-Class Philippine music articles → :Category:Redirect-Class Philippine music task force articles
- :Category:Template-Class Philippine music articles → :Category:Template-Class Philippine music task force articles
- :Category:NA-Class Philippine music articles → :Category:NA-Class Philippine music task force articles
- :Category:Unassessed Philippine music articles → :Category:Unassessed Philippine music task force articles
I recently tried organizing the Philippine music task force of Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines by fixing the talk page banner, adding an article alert system, and assessment categories. After creating all the categories, there were no articles showing up in any of the quality assessment categories. And after reading the banner documentation, I figured that the
|TF_2_ASSESSMENT_CAT = Philippine music task force articlesparameter in the talk page banner may be at fault. I'd like to request for these quality assessment categories be moved to its respective names, accordingly, since the importance assessment categories with the similar naming structure as to the parameter works just fine. It's my first time having to do such, and unfortunately it went to no good. Thank you very much and I apologies for the hassle dealt. – Relayed (t{{•}}c) 11:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
==Category:Demon superheroes==
== Category:Superheroes who are adopted ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: no consensus. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:Superheroes who are adopted to :Category:Fictional adoptees
:Nominator's rationale: Unencyclopedic cross-categorization, while it might be a common trope it is still not defining that one is BOTH a superhero and adopted. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Tell that to an adopted superhero. – Fayenatic London 09:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- :Ha ha ha I guess, but also, what? Is this the CfD equivalent of the Chewbacca defense? ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:30, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I fail to see how tropes are not defining. Dimadick (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Useful as social role models representation for real-world adoptees and adopting parents – TNLNYC (talk) 12:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- :Some tropes are simply trivial, like there would not be a category for "Cowboys who wear hats" because that is always an incidental aspect of their character. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 00:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Merge, trivial intersection. It should be a manual merge though, I expect that many articles are already in one of the other subcategories. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- merge - why only superheroes? Why not also supervillains? Seems very trivial. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:41, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:Superhero schoolteachers ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:Superhero schoolteachers to :Category:Fictional schoolteachers
:Nominator's rationale: Not defining - made by blocked user. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:47, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
::Support per nom. SMasonGarrison 12:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Merge, trivial intersection. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
==Category:Fictional males by franchise==
== Category:Fictional characters from the Solar System ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: rename to :Category:Fictional extraterrestrial characters from the Solar System. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 02:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:Fictional characters from the Solar System to :Category:Fictional extraterrestrial characters
:Nominator's rationale: The title of this category, as written, can encompass most fictional characters ever created. It clearly means "fictional extraterrestrials from within the Solar System", but I'm not sure it passes WP:NONDEF compared to often-used beings like Martians and Venusians, for which there are subcategories. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
:Oppose Category clearly does not include people from Earth. Dimadick (talk) 19:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
::The Earth is part of the Solar System, how is that clear? ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 01:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, the category nicely fits under :Category:Fiction about the Solar System. Possibly rename to :Category:Fictional extraterrestrial characters from the Solar System. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:13, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- :{{ping|Marcocapelle}} That makes sense, but are fictional aliens from random places in the solar system defining compared to aliens in general? I think :Category:Fictional extraterrestrial characters by Solar System planet would be the only thing that made sense, but that would be too small to work regardless. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Rename to :Category:Fictional extraterrestrial characters from the Solar System- this makes it so that the category is better defined. (Oinkers42) (talk) 05:40, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Rename to :Category:Fictional extraterrestrial characters from the Solar System, which reflects the contents is captures a defining element. Earth is part of the Solar System, so we need to be more specific. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
==Category:Fictional extraterrestrial robots==
== Category:Thulinverken vehicles ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:Thulinverken vehicles to :Category:Thulinverken
:Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:Articles with Justapedia origins ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose deleting {{lc|Articles with Justapedia origins}}
:Nominator's rationale: Apart from being a 99.99% WP mirror - for our purposes, Justapedia is merely another crowdsourced platform that should not be used as a source for anything, so there should be no "articles with Justapedia origins". Pointless category. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:56, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
==Category:Languages written in Latin script==
== Category:Fictional Shorinji Kempo practitioners ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:Fictional Shorinji Kempo practitioners to :Category:Fictional kenpō practitioners
:Nominator's rationale: Too small to be necessary, made by a blocked user. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:02, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Why do we need subcategories for types of kenpō? Dimadick (talk) 19:12, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:Fictional sambo practitioners ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:Fictional sambo practitioners to :Category:Fictional hybrid martial artists
:Nominator's rationale: Too small to be necessary. Made by a blocked user. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
==Category:Melee weapons==
== Category:Seneca clans ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge/rename as nominated. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:22, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:Seneca clans to :Category:Iroquois clans
:* Propose renaming :Category:Beaver Clan of the Seneca to :Category:Beaver Clan of the Iroquois
:* Propose renaming :Category:Deer Clan of the Seneca to :Category:Deer Clan of the Iroquois
:* Propose renaming :Category:Snipe Clan of the Seneca to :Category:Snipe Clan of the Iroquois
:* Propose renaming :Category:Turtle Clan of the Seneca to :Category:Turtle Clan of the Iroquois
:* Propose renaming :Category:Wolf Clan of the Seneca to :Category:Wolf Clan of the Iroquois
:Nominator's rationale: Clans are shared between Iroquois nations (for example, a Mohawk Wolf Clan member, an Oneida Wolf Clan member, and a Seneca Wolf Clan member are all considered part of the same clan, see [https://www.haudenosauneeconfederacy.com/clan-system/ here] and [https://oneida-nsn.gov/our-ways/our-story/clan-systems/ here]), and these categories are currently very small with only one of them having more than 3 entries, so populating them with clan members from the other Iroquois nations would be beneficial. 69.159.15.16 (talk) 03:30, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
::Support; however, would :Category:Beaver clan of the Haudenosaunee, etc., be preferable to use?. Yuchitown (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
::Support Peter Flass (talk)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:Fictional taijutsuka ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:22, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:Fictional taijutsuka to :Category:Fictional practitioners of Japanese martial arts
:Nominator's rationale: Pointlessly specific category that I'd be surprised isn't original research for all involved. Made by disruptive account. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:29, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
::Note that the intended targed was moved to :Category:Fictional practitioners of Japanese martial arts, as a result of another CfD. Ymblanter (talk) 06:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
==Category:English Olympic medallists==
==Category:Tiziano Ferro redirects==
== Category:Rutulian film people ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: delete all as empty (nobody supports keeping and nothing to merge). HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:57, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:Rutulian film people to :Category:Rutulian people by occupation
:* Propose merging :Category:Rutulian men by occupation to :Category:Rutulian men
:* Propose merging :Category:Rutulian people in sports to :Category:Rutulian people by occupation
:Nominator's rationale: Redundant category layers SMasonGarrison 02:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:30, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support merge in principle; however, note that I've proposed merging virtually all of the subcategories under these (which all have just one person in each of them) for upmerging to {{cl|Rutul people}} on November 7, meaning that even the target categories here will effectively also be empty if that goes through — so the merger should probably just go directly to {{cl|Rutul people}} instead. Bearcat (talk) 21:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Thoughts on Bearcat's comment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
::I'm fine with merging to the highest level. SMasonGarrison 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- The two nominations are complementary and I support them both. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:17, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment These categories have been emptied so there is no content to Merge. Liz Read! Talk! 06:35, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Right, this discussion is redundant after the other one closed. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
==Category:Restaurants in Hoboken, New Jersey==
== Category:Administrator recall ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose renaming :Category:Administrator recall to :Category:Wikipedia administrator recall
:* Propose renaming :Category:Recall petitions to :Category:Wikipedia administrator recall petitions
:* Propose renaming :Category:Open recall petitions to :Category:Open Wikipedia administrator recall petitions
:* Propose renaming :Category:Successful recall petitions to :Category:Successful Wikipedia administrator recall petitions
:* Propose renaming :Category:Unsuccessful recall petitions to :Category:Unsuccessful Wikipedia administrator recall petitions
:Nominator's rationale: The usual issue with ambiguously-named non-content categories. I would have sent it to speedy but wasn't sure if this was an uncontroversial "established naming convention" under criterion C2B. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:18, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
:{{smalldiv|1=Notified Wikipedia talk:Administrator recall. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)}}
::There is already discussion about this at Wikipedia_talk:Administrator_recall#Categories and we have consensus for these changes. We did not necessarily need a formal proposal for this. Anyone should be free to move them directly Soni (talk) 07:11, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as the person who originally suggested the change. Thryduulf (talk) 08:07, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Less confusion is better. BusterD (talk) 10:55, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- OK I suppose, but really it should be reconfirmation rather than recall in all instances; We're asking the editor to just confirm that she is, indeed, reconfirmed as an admin and if so it is win-win and the system worked. We want to be as kind as possible. That is different conversation tho. (Also, would OK with renaming category to :Category:Pre-1876 life peers or whatever the community wants.) Herostratus (talk) 05:40, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- :{{re|Herostratus}} did you have a copy/paste error? :Category:Pre-1876 life peers is being discussed below and has nothing to do with recall. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:25, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support a rename to recall (i.e. as nominated), per nom. The process is called Wikipedia:Administrator recall, not Administrator reconfirmation. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:25, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:Pre-1876 life peers ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: rename to :Category:Life peers created before 1876. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:* Propose renaming :Category:Pre-1876 life peers to :Category:Life peers created before 1876
:Nominator's rationale: Opposed at speedy. This rename aligns with the subcategories and is generally more clear. Pinging people from CFDS: {{re|Ravenpuff|Fayenatic london|Stephan Leeds|p=}}. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
:Support as original nominator: {{u|Stephan Leeds}}'s argument (below) doesn't quite work because this category contains peers rather than peerages; thus the category tree name is already correct and changing it would make it inconsistent with other similar category. "Created" can only mean "elevated" in this context, not "born", as witnessed by e.g. {{cl|Life peers created by Elizabeth II}}. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 02:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
{{Cot|Copy of speedy discussion}}
- :Category:Pre-1876 life peers to :Category:Life peers created before 1876 – C2C: with subcategories, and generally clearer — RAVENPVFF · talk · 18:22, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- :Oppose: Not a list of peers created (i.e. born, or conceived) before 1876, but of peerages. “Category:Life peerages created before 1876” or “Category:Life peerages before 1876” would useful and not inaccurate, and “List of life peerages before 1876” (not category) already exists. Stephan Leeds (talk) 00:47, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- :: {{ping|Stephan Leeds}} true, but all the subcats use "Life peers created by…", so the nomination was valid under C2C. Do you want to nominate the cat and its sub-(sub-)cats for a full CFD? – Fayenatic London 21:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- ::{{re|Stephan Leeds}} This category contains biographical articles about peers (people), not articles about peerages (titles), so the category tree name is correct. As Fayenatic london stated, this is the same as all other subcategories, e.g. {{cl|Life peers created by Charles III}}. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 16:02, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
{{cob}}
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.