Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Endgame tablebase/1

{{atopr}}

: {{al|Endgame tablebase|noname=yes}} • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Endgame_tablebase/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review

: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Endgame tablebase/1|Category:GAR/74}} Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

This 2007 listing contains significant unctied material, failing GA criterion 2b); it may also need to be updated, as a message on the talk page calls attention to "outdated metrics". ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:30, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

:I made a bunch of edits few months ago which I believe largely solves the outdated problem. I think most of uncited material could just be removed, as it's pretty unnecessary. Jack234567 (talk) 21:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

:I'll go through this paragraph by paragraph and see what's trivial to do. Remsense留 01:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

:Yeah, I would say there's also a lot of WP:FANCRUFT for a non-general audience that makes it difficult to know how to begin reorganizing the article. Remsense留 01:20, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

• Delist: there is still a lot of uncited material. Phlsph7 (talk) 09:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

{{abot}}