Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Fastra II/1
=[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Fastra II/1|Fastra II]]=
{{atopr}}
: {{al|Fastra II|noname=yes}} • • Most recent review
: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Fastra II/1|Category:GAR/86}} Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:33, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
As I noted on the article's talk page in April, a fair bit of this article's content is unsourced. Most of what is sourced is sourced only to the company that made this product's own publications, or to web sources of uncertain reliability. I do not believe this article meets the current sourcing expectations for GAs. The original nominator was blocked for socking several years ago. Hog Farm Talk 04:15, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
:I don't do much work at GAR so I'm not familiar with the process, but I will say that I agree with HF's assessment. In addition, much of the article is written in the present tense ("The operating system is CentOS") which is certainly inappropriate today. Given that the primary author is no longer here, it seems unlikely this will get fixed, so the article should be delisted. RoySmith (talk) 02:26, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
{{abot}}