Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Flag of convenience/1

=[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Flag of convenience/1|Flag of convenience]]=

{{atopr}}

: {{al|Flag of convenience|noname=yes}} • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Flag_of_convenience/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]Most recent review

: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Flag of convenience/1|Category:GAR/80}} Result: Taking into account PI71's comments too, consensus to delist. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

There is some uncited text, including entire paragraphs. There are lots of sources listed in "Further reading" that should be considered included in the article. {{u|Pl71}} has stated that the "Port State Control" section is too long with irrelevant information, and other examples of WP:OVERKILL. Z1720 (talk) 16:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

{{abot}}