Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Franklin's lost expedition/1

=[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Franklin's lost expedition/1|Franklin's lost expedition]]=

{{atopr}}

: {{al|Franklin's lost expedition|noname=yes}} • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Franklin%27s_lost_expedition/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]Most recent review

: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Franklin's lost expedition/1|Category:GAR/78}} Result: In addition to the existing citation needed tags, I just went through and added two dozen more. This clearly falls well short of WP:GACR and if in an initial review would certainly qualify for WP:QF RoySmith (talk) 16:25, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

An early 2008 listing that has clearly shown its age. Some uncited paragraphs here and there; a few "[citation needed]" tags; and a heap of "[unreliable source?]" alerts in the timeline. (Subject of AMC's original The Terror miniseries.) --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 09:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

:Hi, I will try to restore the article to GA level. What is your timeline for this? 10-20 days? Matarisvan (talk) 12:25, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

::Nothing specific (this topic is outside my interests), but three to four weeks sounds reasonable. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 13:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

::Hi {{u|Matarisvan}} do you still intend to work on this? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

{{abot}}