Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/International System of Units/1
=[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/International System of Units/1|International System of Units]]=
{{atopr}}
: {{al|International System of Units|noname=yes}} • • Most recent review
: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/International System of Units/1|Category:GAR/74}} Result: Not much improvement, sadly. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:57, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
This 2013 listing was tagged with {{tl|GAR request}} in July. There is significant amounts of uncited material, and a behemothic notes section which seems mostly irrelevant, tbh. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
:{{ping|Chiswick Chap|XOR'easter}}, I remember that you two have improved previous units-related articles back to a good standard at GAR; would you be willing to have a look at this article? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:31, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
::After the John von Neumann discussion, I never want to participate in a GAR again. XOR'easter (talk) 22:36, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
:::Well, that's a massive shame; I won't ping you again. Best of luck, ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- That is some notes section. Not an issue by itself, but holding quite a lot of uncited text, and some notes seem to be summaries of wikilinked articles. There is unfortunately quite a lot of uncited text throughout the article. CMD (talk) 07:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
{{abot}}