Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Lam Tin/1

{{atopr}}

: {{al|Lam Tin|noname=yes}} • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Lam_Tin/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • GAN review not found

: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Lam Tin/1|Category:GAR/68}} Result: No improvements for two and a half weeks, issues remain. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:39, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

A GA from 2007. There's a good (or bad) amount of uncited material that should be addressed. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

:@Deryck Chan: I see you've done some maintenance here after the start of the GAR. How do you see the article vs the GA criteria? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 08:46, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

::Getting there. It was 10 years since I last edited the article! Lam Tin was promoted to GA before paragraph by paragraph inline citations became mandatory, so there was some work to be done. In the meantime 10+ years of local history have happened. I've trimmed content that have become outdated. User:Underwaterbuffalo has also been doing great work brushing up the article. Deryck C. 10:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

{{abot}}