Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Loitering munition/1

=[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Loitering munition/1|Loitering munition]]=

{{atopr}}

: {{al|Loitering munition|noname=yes}} • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Loitering_munition/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]Most recent review

: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Loitering munition/1|Category:GAR/77}} Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Primarily due to unreferenced statements. There are also the issues of vague language, overcitation, and what appears to be either overcitation or poor citation by listing all of a couple paragraphs' references at their ends. Primium (talk) 17:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

  • Delist - An article largely comprised of anecdotes from the Russian invasion of Ukraine does not an article make. Schierbecker (talk) 04:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

{{abot}}