Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Phil Simms/1

{{atopr}}

: {{al|Phil Simms|noname=yes}} • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Phil_Simms/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review

: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Phil Simms/1|Category:GAR/70}} Result: No improvement. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Significant citation issues, including uncited statistics and BLP content. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

:Delist: Interesting article and clearly took a lot of work, but I think it should be delisted due to BLP violations. I can't even see a citation for DOB. Requires extensive spotcheck, which is beyond the scope of an easy fix. Ppt91^talk 21:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

::I was the one who nominated and the main contributor for this article for Good Article status but havent worked on it years nor maintained it. In next few days if you guys are patient I can fix some issues. I know you can delist and I can re-apply but it would be easier for me to fix the issues in the coming days if you all are patient. AaronY (talk) 07:17, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

:::That is indeed the purpose of GAR...take your time. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:40, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

:::@AaronY Absolutely! Thanks for picking this up. Ppt91^talk 00:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

::::Any update {{u|AaronY}}? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:08, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

{{abot}}

I forgot about this, dang. Wish someone would have contacted my talk page. AaronY (talk) 09:22, 18 May 2023 (UTC)