Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Riya Sen/1
= [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Riya Sen/1|Riya Sen]] =
{{atopr}}
: {{al|Riya Sen|noname=yes}} • • Most recent review
: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Riya Sen/1|Category:GAR/77}} Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
It was assessed 16 years ago and it underwent a lot of edits since then. There are a lot of citation-needed templates, along with unsourced filmography sections, a lot of grammatical, (especially punctuation and wording errors), as well as factual discrepancies and poor sourcing. For example, as of this nom, it incorporates her birthday being on two different dates and years. In the lede and infobox, it is listed as 24 January 1989, but in the personal life section, it is listed as "Born on 24 January 1981." It also does not follow conventional section ordering and manual of styles. Right after the lede, there's the "Acting career" section, wherein, it should've been another section, such as Early life and family. But these details are listed sporadically in the latter sections.
It is also generally not well written.
Anyone with a cursory look can tell this does not meet the standard of Good Article we have set here. X (talk) 05:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
{{abot}}