Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Stonyhurst College/1
=[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Stonyhurst College/1|Stonyhurst College]]=
{{atopr}}
: {{al|Stonyhurst College|noname=yes}} • • Most recent review
: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Stonyhurst College/1|Category:GAR/79}} Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
This has been tagged as needing GAR since July. It was originally promoted in 2008. There are four maintenance tags on the article (excessive self-published sources, academic boosterism, promotional tone, and excessive detail), apparently each added by a different editor. Two editors have also agreed on the talk page that GAR is needed. From my own cursory review, I've found a handful of uncited paragraphs and a number of page needed tags. I have not gone through the article exhaustively, but the concerns raised appear reasonable, so I am bringing this to GAR. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
:Also notifying {{re|Epicgenius|Czarking0}} who expressed support for GAR on the talk page. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:22, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
::Thanks for the tag. I support further investigation in GAR and thank you for bringing it forward. I have occupied with other tings at the moment so I probably will not be able to give this the attention it needs Czarking0 (talk) 21:54, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist - Yikes, just yikes. I don't think further comment is needed. JpTheNotSoSuperior (talk) 18:16, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist: major PoV issues. I'm particularly struck by the description of the Gunpowder Plot as a "controversial event". I would also strongly suspect that parts of the article are out of date, especially that about taking ten GCSEs as standard, which is cited to a 2008 source and is definitely not the norm nowadays, even in elite academic private schools. Other prose and MoS issues throughout, which would be a problem at GAN. UndercoverClassicist T·C 15:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
{{abot}}