Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Coherency (homotopy theory)

{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{mfd top collapse|1=Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Coherency (homotopy theory)}}|}}

__NOINDEX__

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus . ♠PMC(talk) 01:03, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

==[[:Draft:Coherency (homotopy theory)]]==

:{{pagelinks|Draft:Coherency (homotopy theory)}}

Not a math stub, just two refs placed here over 2 years ago. Up for G13. Bringing forward for discussion as the G13 was declined 6 months ago. Legacypac (talk) 09:25, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep: The references given in the draft show there are enough materials for a standalone article. — Taku (talk) 11:03, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{collapse bottom}}|}}