Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Elizabeth Blake-Thomas

{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{mfd top collapse|1=Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Elizabeth Blake-Thomas}}|}}

__NOINDEX__

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete (G11), deleted by {{u|Deb}}. (non-admin closure) SD0001 (talk) 17:55, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

==[[:Draft:Elizabeth Blake-Thomas]]==

:{{pagelinks|Draft:Elizabeth Blake-Thomas}}

Unsourced draft on film director. The subject appears to have had two employees write drafts about her and submit them to AFC. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Elizabeth_Blake-Thomas .

The second one was deleted as G11. This is the first one, and its author has not declared their conflict of interest. Subject may or may not be notable, but this draft isn't getting there and isn't much of an improvement over the second one. Recommend a Soft Delete and Extended-Confirmed Protection in draft space and article space to allow creation by a neutral editor. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete and protect as suggested. I took out a spam link to her daughter's website but I can't fix the lack of references and WP:OR included here. Legacypac (talk) 19:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

:Sorry, I speedied this as I only saw the speedy notice. Deb (talk) 12:30, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{collapse bottom}}|}}