Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:HoveringTurtle Wikipedia destroyer
{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{mfd top collapse|1=Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:HoveringTurtle Wikipedia destroyer}}|}}
__NOINDEX__
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy deleted. (non-administrator close) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 01:46, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
==[[:Draft:HoveringTurtle Wikipedia destroyer]]==
:{{pagelinks|1=Draft:HoveringTurtle Wikipedia destroyer}}
Declined speedy deletion. I tried to get this removed under WP:G3 but it wasn't blatant enough to be deleted. No amount of editing could make 'HoveringTurtle Wikipedia destroyer' an acceptable article for an encyclopaedia. I feel that this article meets the spirit of WP:G10 as it relates to a living person and it is entirely negative in tone and unsourced.
At best, this is completely misplaced. If this is a serious accusation of sockpuppetry, then it should be written up at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HoveringTurtle, with appropriate evidence. As things stand, this is just an unsourced accusation against another user and is outside scope for draft space as it would never be a viable encyclopaedia article. I don't think accusation pages about other users in draft space should be permitted and letting this one stay might be a slippery slope. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:29, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete [various reasons]. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:53, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy delete under WP:G10. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 00:09, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete G10 Andy Dingley (talk) 00:21, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - As written, this has aspects of an attack page, G10. The originator does seem to be trying to report abuse by a sockpuppeteer, but this is very much the wrong way to report abuse, and the blocked user doesn't appear to have engaged in abuse within the past year. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:51, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete It does meet G10 as a negative unsourced BLP, and it should have been accepted under that rationale. SK2242 (talk) 01:09, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- I did an IAR delete on the basis that wasting time on trolling is not productive. I'll leave this for someone to close or reverse. Johnuniq (talk) 01:39, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{collapse bottom}}|}}